I've found that if I stop to post on every interesting chunk of Rosenblatt I will have no time for any other classes. Nevertheless,
In the 3rd and 4th chapters, she begins to address concerns as an English educator--schools are too often failing to provide contexts for students to experience a vital personal reaction to art in the form of text. Schools make a frame with no picture--students regurgitate what they think the teacher thinks of a story, and fail to give a real response. Things don't change because teachers uphold certain expectations (as do parents and everyone raised in traditional mainstream public schools) of what school should do and look like: writing traditional essays and answering multiple choice questions about who the main character was. Teachers have to value true literature experiences themselves, liberate pupils from self-defeating practices, give them freedom to wrestle with ideas and emotions, and not place so much value on a particular form of response.
"The study of literature should give the student the form of emotional release that all art offers and, at the same time, without strain or pressure, should help him gain ever more complex satisfactions from literature." (71)
"A poem or a novel should provide fresh insight. Readers, therefore, must be helped to develop flexibility of mind, a freedom from rigid emotional habits, if they are to enter the aesthetic experiences the artist has made possible." (98)
Rosenblatt does a decent job of capturing the upheaval of the adolescent mind--changing body images and obsessive self-consciousness, a desire to reflect what's "normal (and here I suggest more attention to media awareness in our curriculum is needed)," struggling to find independence and emancipation from familial structures. They need links to their experiences to be present in the books they read. They need to be emotionally and intellectually ready to reevaluate assumptions and cultural suggestions, and to adjust accordingly. This is how readers live in the world.
Easy to see why fundies are so scared.
I return to my question about whether or not some books may be universally accessible. I feel like Rosenblatt's saying yes. But not without a lot of trickiness.
a blog for class.
Thursday, September 27, 2007
Adolesense
Labels:
life,
literacy,
literature as exploration,
media,
reader response,
reading,
Rosenblatt
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)



1 comment:
She does seem to use language that supports the notion that there can be universal texts. I noticed it most when she talked about the things we all have in common: birth, death & a third I can't remember and don't have the book in front of me.
It does make sense that we have these most basic of things in common, but the ways in which different individuals and cultures approach birth & death still make it hard for me to believe that there really is a universal.
Post a Comment