The internet as a tool has infinitely affected the way that we think, as Bomer says, "this symbolic, theoretical aspect of a tool and its use is an instance of the relationship between the material and the idea, or materiality and ideality" (226). Both the opportunities and needs for use and the ideality between its function are staggering--many people probably no longer compose on paper, do their taxes by hand, apply for jobs, use the Yellow Pages, research papers, pay bills, shop, or write letters anymore. But the issues of past weeks' discussions concerning language and communication were still on my mind--a few days ago I subbed for an older teacher as she struggled to log into a website where she would take an interactive test (TOPS Protocol? Any other English teachers heard about this bullshit?) after completing a review session with video clips, mini-quizzes, slides, etc. It literally took her all day. Had I known she needed help, I would have easily rescued her by clicking the correct part of the menu, turning off the number lock, logging in, and skipping through the slides, which I did when she finally asked at the end of the day. Easy, right? No. What comes easily to me, almost naturally, did not to her. Even as I write this, I read an email from my mom asking how to use the word count. I realized that in the last year I've continued to pick up online tools without formal guidance, just by playing around. I don't say this to brag, I know everyone who reads this also knows how to do those things. My point is...well, it has something to do with play, learning, and tools. Let me talk about play first before I finish that thought.
"A child's
greatest achievements are possible in play, achievements that tomorrow will become her basic level of real action and morality," said Vygotsky. I truly believe the best thing you can do for a kid as a parent is give them a good childhood, including lots of time to play. I thank my parents for long summer days, sprinklers, tree-climbing, snow forts, library trips, and mud pies. Most of my toys were ten year old hand-me-downs, including the Ken doll whose head popped off. A Playskool record player with accompanying Disney books and records. Kickball. As I grew older, my best friend and I played restaurant, school, hotel, secret detective, and casino. More kickball. As I grew older still, we didn't really play anymore, but we sat around and talked about boys and music and social events, and played sports. I think this has fostered my imagination and creativity, made me into a well-rounded person: I've had a lot of different jobs and roles in my life so far. What did you play when you were little?"While playing at using the associated tools, they appropriate not just the tool and its proper functioning but the kinds of cultural and relational uses to which the object could be put. They rehearse not just the intellectual skills of writing but the subjectivity positions, attitudes, relations, and purposes that people take on when they write" (pg. 229).
While subbing I thought about tools, signs, mediums of knowledge and functionality in a school setting. I thought about the tools in place but not used, such as the motivational posters on the walls, the movie left for the sub to show the class, the websites the kids choose to use on their own. My favorite poster:
There were opportunities for learning in discussing these things rather than taking them for granted. I thought about how frustrating it was to watch the kids lose, steal, or demolish school supplies such as pencils, binders, books. I thought about how the district misuses tools for assessment, from TAKS to TOPS Protocol, wasting time and losing good teachers. "The teacher could not limit the nature of the instruction students received. The larger culture teaches even what school does not" (p. 245).
In terms of teaching and closing the achievement gap, we've spent considerable time discussing how to be culturally-responsive, and should include the tools, actions, discourses, and activities students bring to the table. This is especially valuable because of the schism between home culture and school culture and the need to soften the transition. We should also dispose of what doesn't work, starting from the top down--God knows public education is way too cluttered anyway.
To get down to brass tacks, we are put here with each other and the earth and have to learn how to work with both. Since most of our conflicts deal with miscommunication and greed of some kind, it makes sense that if we could learn to do those things, it'd be a closer-to-perfect world. Then we'd be smart.
There were opportunities for learning in discussing these things rather than taking them for granted. I thought about how frustrating it was to watch the kids lose, steal, or demolish school supplies such as pencils, binders, books. I thought about how the district misuses tools for assessment, from TAKS to TOPS Protocol, wasting time and losing good teachers. "The teacher could not limit the nature of the instruction students received. The larger culture teaches even what school does not" (p. 245).In terms of teaching and closing the achievement gap, we've spent considerable time discussing how to be culturally-responsive, and should include the tools, actions, discourses, and activities students bring to the table. This is especially valuable because of the schism between home culture and school culture and the need to soften the transition. We should also dispose of what doesn't work, starting from the top down--God knows public education is way too cluttered anyway.
To get down to brass tacks, we are put here with each other and the earth and have to learn how to work with both. Since most of our conflicts deal with miscommunication and greed of some kind, it makes sense that if we could learn to do those things, it'd be a closer-to-perfect world. Then we'd be smart.



4 comments:
I totally agree with you about play and how important it is in a child's life. I was also blessed with parents who knew to let me spend hours freely exploring the backyard. I think that in this day and age children's lives are so filled with scheduled, structured activities that they don't have time to really play. Thus, they don't get to explore and experiment with the tools in their environment and learn by experience what they are used for. Not to mention the fact that they don't get to freely socialize with other children and thus learn how to share, get along, problem solve, and be independent. I don't mean to get on a soap box, especially because I know you understand what I'm talking about. This issue just really gets to me and I think it needs to be given more attention by school districts, teachers, and parents.
i was just thinking about the things kids play with this weekend while over at a friend's house. she has 2 boys, and it was the biggest clutter of toys i had ever seen. now, one could say these are "tools for learning" but i wouldn't say so. i looked at those toys and wondered about their value in teaching children imagination. like the picture of your boy, my friend would probably have a picture of her boy with a real violin. there's no freedom to name your own toys because what's got a "real name" is already there. there's no invention with putting two unknown things together and calling it a violin. i think we grew up in a different time when we had the opportunity to name our own objects. we made pots and pans--the things around the house--into our own. pans became cars, under that dinner table was the hair salon, etc.
Yes, I have encountered the "bullshit" that is the TOPS protocol. I could have helped her out, too, by telling her, "Just give the essay a score that is one point higher than you think it should be." I made a 100 on my TOPS test by doing that. It IS trash, and it's a big waste of time. And I want to know who is going to sit down and read the in-class essays every ESL student in the district wrote. They'll probably end up in a warehouse somewhere, but hey, we're accountable, right? We jumped through the hoops.
I, too, am disheartened by the way my students treat the tools in my classroom. I was most surprised to find out how common stealing simple things like markers and rubber bands is in my school. Do they not understand I purchase art supplies so they can all benefit from a hands-on, creative, fun exercise rather than a boring copy of a worksheet??? ::bangs head against wall again::
However, I never put as much thought into these tools as I did this weekend after the readings. I guess I learned that these kids weren't taught to value anything, like that's a surprise. You said, "I thought about how the district misuses tools for assessment, from TAKS to TOPS Protocol, wasting time and losing good teachers." If parents don't teach children how to value tools, and schools misuse tools, then how can we blame kids? (And who can blame that good teacher when she walks out the door?)
Yeah, and don't you love how if you don't pass the TOPS test you still have to evaluate essays but someone who has passed has to check you??? That's punishing the people who pass!
I agree with you, Melody, although there are lots of great educational toys/tools, they don't always foster much creativity or imagination. As far as misuse of school tools goes, it doesn't seem like a simple conversation with the kids about respect would work, and districts are too cowed by the government to stand up and say no to stupid shit like TOPS. I don't know where that leaves us, except here in grad school talking about how we should/could change things.
Post a Comment